Agriculture  

         

Introduction

About the publication

Environmental policy

Social - economic indicators
Industry
Energy
Agriculture
Services
Transport
Tourism

Nature of Latvia

While there has been a decline in the added value of the agricultural sector, it is still important in the economy of Latvia. About 15% of labour force are employed in agriculture (17-18% including forestry, hunting and fishing. Its contribution to the GDP has been gradually decreasing, from 10.8% in 1995 to 4.5 in 2000. The total production during this period has decreased yearly on average by 7%, but in the year 2000 for the first time an increase (by 3.3%) was observed.

Added value of agriculture sector in the GDP of Latvia, 1990-2000
[Enlarge the picture]

A rather low contribution to the GDP and the relatively high employment in agriculture indicate low efficiency of the sector. In the European Union, the added value per person employed in agriculture is 10 times higher than in Latvia. The causes of low efficiency are mainly small farm size, old equipment, ancient technologies, and the low level of specialization.

Total employment in the agricultural sector in Latvia, 1990-2000
[Enlarge the picture]

The low efficiency in the agricultural sector is also coupled with eco-efficiency: while the amounts of applied pesticides and mineral fertilizers have increased during the past 5 years, the added value of the sector has changed only slightly, with a declining tendency.

Eco-efficiency of the agricultural sector, 1995-2000
[Enlarge the picture]

Between the mid 1990's and 1999, cultivation of plants has dominated in agriculture. In 2000, production in plant cultivation increased by 1% (compared to that in 1999). During the same period, and livestock breeding increased by 10%, bringing it into a leader position with 51.5% of the total.

No stable trends have been observed in growth of cereal crop production, even over a 10-year period. Both the productivity and production of cereal crops show synchronous fluctuations between years.

Numbers of livestock and poultry have declined in unison, much more rapidly than the decrease in the population of Latvia. Latvia has not been able to regain external markets since the time of the centrally planned economy, when the agricultural system of Latvia had an important role in supplying products to the industrial-administrative centres of Russia.

  • Agricultural land-use coverage was 38.5% in the country: arable land - 28.7%, meadows and pastures - 9.4%, and permanent crops - 0.5%.
Coverage of agricultural and other land-use in Latvia, 2000
[Enlarge the picture]

Export of food products has been steadily decreasing. In 1995, food production contributed 16.4% of the export, compared to 5.4% in 2000 (decline by about 2/3) after the Russian crisis. The total export/import balance for agricultural goods is negative, and is continuing to fall (-10.3% in 1995 and -11.8% in 2000).

Price liberalization led to a rapid decline in application of mineral fertilizers in Latvia between 1992 and 1995. Compared to the initial levels in 1992, which exceeded the levels in the European Union by about two times, the amounts applied per hectare decreased to 1/3 of that in the European Union. Since 1995, application of mineral fertilizers and pesticides has increased. Mineral fertilizer application increased particularly between 1995 and 1996 (by 17%) and in the subsequent year (by 26%). Growth of pesticide consumption was 150% between 1996 and 1995, and 100% between 2000 and 1999. This increase in agrochemical use much surpassed the increase in productivity. During the same period of time, the use of organic fertilizers declined.

Mineral fertilizer and pesticide consumption and cereal yields, 1995-2000
[Enlarge the picture]